Week 7: Online Culture
This week readings are about a specific idea of different “online cultures”. The Internet is a broad place and has a “spot” for everyone pretty much. There are so many different types of online cultures and norms. Regardless of your race, hobbies, culture, anything there is something for you to be a part of online. In Boyd’s reading one topic that stuck out to me was the merge from MySpace to Facebook. This part stood out to me the most because I agree with how it was called “ghetto”. Boyd states, “The notion that MySpace may be understood as a digital ghetto introduces an analytic opportunity to explore the divisions between MySpace and Facebook…” (4) Obviously there was more to explore than just people saying “okay MySpace is ghetto I’m gonna move to Facebook” and that’s exactly what Boyd wants to accomplish. In Sydell’s article she discuses a totally different culture of the Internet. The online gaming world is a totally different ball game from the social media world. I feel as if they have similar qualities in a sense of communicating via instant message or AIM, but other than that they are different. They are two completely different concepts. One is working towards a goal, completing levels, unlocking things and beating the game. Another is just posting your life on line via statuses pictures and such. Online gaming is just as much of a moneymaker as social media is. In her article Sydell states, “Online computer games are an over-$300 million industry and growing. World of Warcraft, or WOW, is a massively multiplayer online game, or MMOG, that has more than four million registered users.” Each culture online creates its own audience and users. In my opinion all aspects of the Internet are popular, and your culture will reflect on what part of the Internet you most use.
Week 8: Online Community
In my opinion the idea of an online community can be helpful and hurtful, it just depends on the situation. There are many different kinds of online communities; there is a place for everyone. I think that if you are in a positive environment online it is possible to form friendships and be beneficial to your life. It can be used as a mean of support. In Baym’s article, Communities and Networks, it is stated “Most online groups are not so tied to geographical space, yet people who are involved in online groups think of them as shared places.” (75) The people involved in these places all feel a sense of closeness to one another because they are sharing ideas and thoughts. Possibly thoughts that they feel cannot be shared anywhere else. To me, this is a helpful type of an online environment. You are creating a bond with others who have similar interests as you. On the other hand, in McCabe’s article, Resisting Alienation, he confirms the idea of comfort by saying, “Individuals with eating disorders feel safe and comfortable in places where the outside world cannot intrude on their behaviors.” (7) This is an unhealthy type of online environment because no body is reprimanding these people with these disorders. They may realize that what they are doing is wrong but no one is stopping them, or helping them. They are all in this group together for support from each other, because they are all doing the same thing and they all view themselves in the same way. I feel as if this is extremely unhealthy because they are not gaining any help and will just continue to get worse.
As for online and offline communication I feel as if it depends on what kind of group they are in. The eating disorder community I feel would be more comfortable stating their issues online because they are hiding behind a computer screen, they are not forced to discuss any issues in person with anyone. With other communities it is possible for them to meet online and offline, depending on what kind of community.
Week 9: Virtual Ethnography
If you plan on doing research on an online community you must first become familiar with the community. I feel as if you have to have some knowledge about the community you are in before going there, this is how you will know what questions to ask that wont offend anyone and will be appropriate. Once you gain enough basic knowledge about the community it will be much easier for you to develop more in depth questions that will help you further your research. One tactic that Denise Carter used was asking the people in the community to fill out questionnaires. Then she states, “In addition to the questionnaires I asked 22 of the inhabitants to write me short stories or monologues about their personal relationships in Cybercity, thus simulating an open-ended interview process.” (151) By asking these open ended questions this gave room to receive more answers and research, as opposed to a question that can only be answered with one word. Once you continue to keep going back to the same community, this will build credibility and make the users trust you more, which will make it easier for you to receive more fulfilling answers.